DIRECT AND INDIRECT EXPRESSION OF SPEECH ACTS IN UZBEKI
Keywords:
speech act, direct speech act, communicative purpose, purposeful speech, speech communication
Abstract
This article talks about the formation of speech act theory as a linguistic-philosophical doctrine, the introduction of the concept of speech act into linguistics. The problems of the speech act and the means of speech formation and the critical attitude expressed to the theoretical views put forward in this regard are described. The role and importance of rhetorical interrogative sentences in the expression of indirect speech acts is explained.
References
1. Safarov Sh. Pragmalingvistika. - Toshkent: O‘zME, 2008.
2. Leontev A.A. Deyatelnost. Soznanie. Lichnost. – M.: Politizdat, 1977.
3. Hakimov M.H. O‘zbek tilida matnning pragmatik talqini: Filol. Fan. d-ri diss. - Toshkent, 2001.
4. Lingvisticheskiy ensiklopedicheskiy slovar //http://tapemark.narod.ru/les/412c.html.
5. Pochepsov O.G. Osnovы pragmaticheskogo opisaniya predlojeniya. - Kiev, 1986.
6. Serl Dj.R. Chto takoe rechevoy akt? V kn.: Novoe v zarubejnoy lingvistike. Vыp. 17. - M.: Progress, 1986.
7. Kurbonova M. Bolalarga xos nutqiy akt turlarining pragmalingvistik tahlili (P.Qodirov asarlari misolida) // Xorijiy filologiya: til, adabiyot, ta’lim. 2016. - No4.
8. Arso Setyaji. How speech acts work in translation: an analysis on speech acts in translating a script of Titanic film //UNS Journal of language studies – 2014. – Vol. 03. – №.01. – P.18.
9. Buzrukova M. O'zbek badiiy matnida undash konstruksiyalari //Xorijiy filologiya – 2020. – №1. – B.108
10. Safarov Sh. Pragmalingvistika: monografiya. – Toshkent, 2008. – B.77-82.
11. Searle J.R. A classification of illocutionary acts //Language in society – 1976. – Vol. 5 – №1. – P.1.
12. Choerunnisa R. An analysis of speech acts in the dead poets society: a thesis. – University of Yogyakarta, 2015.
2. Leontev A.A. Deyatelnost. Soznanie. Lichnost. – M.: Politizdat, 1977.
3. Hakimov M.H. O‘zbek tilida matnning pragmatik talqini: Filol. Fan. d-ri diss. - Toshkent, 2001.
4. Lingvisticheskiy ensiklopedicheskiy slovar //http://tapemark.narod.ru/les/412c.html.
5. Pochepsov O.G. Osnovы pragmaticheskogo opisaniya predlojeniya. - Kiev, 1986.
6. Serl Dj.R. Chto takoe rechevoy akt? V kn.: Novoe v zarubejnoy lingvistike. Vыp. 17. - M.: Progress, 1986.
7. Kurbonova M. Bolalarga xos nutqiy akt turlarining pragmalingvistik tahlili (P.Qodirov asarlari misolida) // Xorijiy filologiya: til, adabiyot, ta’lim. 2016. - No4.
8. Arso Setyaji. How speech acts work in translation: an analysis on speech acts in translating a script of Titanic film //UNS Journal of language studies – 2014. – Vol. 03. – №.01. – P.18.
9. Buzrukova M. O'zbek badiiy matnida undash konstruksiyalari //Xorijiy filologiya – 2020. – №1. – B.108
10. Safarov Sh. Pragmalingvistika: monografiya. – Toshkent, 2008. – B.77-82.
11. Searle J.R. A classification of illocutionary acts //Language in society – 1976. – Vol. 5 – №1. – P.1.
12. Choerunnisa R. An analysis of speech acts in the dead poets society: a thesis. – University of Yogyakarta, 2015.
Published
2024-02-28
How to Cite
Dilnoza GOFUROVA, & Dilnoza GOFUROVA. (2024). DIRECT AND INDIRECT EXPRESSION OF SPEECH ACTS IN UZBEKI. News of the NUUz, 1(1.2.1), 300-303. https://doi.org/10.69617/uzmu.v1i1.2.1.1246
Section
Articles
.jpg)
1.png)
This work is licensed under a 