LINGUISTIC UNITS REPRESENTING THE CATEGORY OF STATE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE
Keywords:
stative units, stative category, linguistic method, syntactic analysis.
Abstract
This article analyzes units representing the category of state in English and their expression in sentence structure. Also at the syntactic level, using comparatively typologically precise linguistic methods, the category of stativeness and devices with stative units were studied.
References
1. Abduazizov A.A, Bushuy A.M, Bushuy A i dr. Istoriya latvisticheskiy tipologii. – Tashkent: NUU, 2006.-176 s
2. Barxudarov L.S. Ocherki po morfologii sovremennogo angliyskogo yazika.- Moskva: Visshaya shkola,1975.-156 s
3. Filimonova O.E. Substansialnie i kvalifikativnie stativnie sintaksemi v stukture angliyskogo predlojeniya\\ Gersenovskiye chteniya. Inostrannie yaziki(nauchnie dokladi) Leningrad: 1975.-S.38-42.
4. Haliday M. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. – L.: Oxford University Press, 2004. – 421 p.
5. Ilyish B.A. The structure of modern English. Moscow – Leningrad: Prosveshenie. 1971.-31-32 p.
6. Lenz Z. Deictic Conceptualization of Space, Time and Person//Deictic Conceptualisation of Space, Time and Person. -Amesterdam/ Philadelphia. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2003.-P.7-13.
7. Kilichev E. Xozirgi uzbek adabiy tili. Buxoro, Buxoro Universiteti nashriyoti, 2001.-228b
8. Muxin A.M. Sintaksemniy analiz i problemi urovney yazika. Leningrad: Nauka,1980.-304 s.
9. Usmonov O‘. Gap tahliliga yangicha yondoshuv\\ Xalqaro ilmiy anjuman materiallari. SamDCHTIning 10 yilligiga bag‘ishlanadi.- Samarkand: SamDCHTI nashri, 2004.-B.106-107.
10. Usmonov O‘.U., Ashurov Sh.S. Ingliz tili nazariy grammatikasi. – Samarqand, 2007.-88 b.
2. Barxudarov L.S. Ocherki po morfologii sovremennogo angliyskogo yazika.- Moskva: Visshaya shkola,1975.-156 s
3. Filimonova O.E. Substansialnie i kvalifikativnie stativnie sintaksemi v stukture angliyskogo predlojeniya\\ Gersenovskiye chteniya. Inostrannie yaziki(nauchnie dokladi) Leningrad: 1975.-S.38-42.
4. Haliday M. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. – L.: Oxford University Press, 2004. – 421 p.
5. Ilyish B.A. The structure of modern English. Moscow – Leningrad: Prosveshenie. 1971.-31-32 p.
6. Lenz Z. Deictic Conceptualization of Space, Time and Person//Deictic Conceptualisation of Space, Time and Person. -Amesterdam/ Philadelphia. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2003.-P.7-13.
7. Kilichev E. Xozirgi uzbek adabiy tili. Buxoro, Buxoro Universiteti nashriyoti, 2001.-228b
8. Muxin A.M. Sintaksemniy analiz i problemi urovney yazika. Leningrad: Nauka,1980.-304 s.
9. Usmonov O‘. Gap tahliliga yangicha yondoshuv\\ Xalqaro ilmiy anjuman materiallari. SamDCHTIning 10 yilligiga bag‘ishlanadi.- Samarkand: SamDCHTI nashri, 2004.-B.106-107.
10. Usmonov O‘.U., Ashurov Sh.S. Ingliz tili nazariy grammatikasi. – Samarqand, 2007.-88 b.
Published
2024-02-28
How to Cite
Malokhat TO‘QBOYEVA, & Malokhat TO‘QBOYEVA. (2024). LINGUISTIC UNITS REPRESENTING THE CATEGORY OF STATE IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE. News of the NUUz, 1(1.2.1), 337-340. https://doi.org/10.69617/uzmu.v1i1.2.1.1259
Section
Articles
.jpg)
1.png)
This work is licensed under a 