GRAMMATICAL INDICATORS OF COMPLETION

  • Manuchehr SALOXIDDINOV Samarqand davlat chet tillar instituti o‘qituvchi
Keywords: Prototype, relevance, perfect, pragmatic, action, descriptive construction

Abstract

In this article, the semantic features represented by the grammatical category of the perfect, the lack of comparative study of the meanings of the lexical-semantic groups of the verb in this form, the analysis of its conceptual essence and pragmatic expression in the communication process were considered. The semantics of state and action in differentiating events was thoroughly applied through examples. Completion is also discussed as the final phase, result, and semantic realization of various events in transformative situations.

References

1. Comrie B., Vogel P. Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes. –Berlin, 2000.– 514 p.
2. Langacker R.W. The English present tense //English Language and Linguistics, 2001.5 (2): –P. 251–272.
3. McCauley J. D. Notes on the English perfect // Australian journal of linguistics, 1, 1981. –P. 81–90.
4. Mirsanov G‘.Q. Ingliz va o‘zbek tillarida yurish-harakat fe'llarining aksional va aspektual xususiyatlari. Filol.fan.n....diss. avtoref. –T.:, 2009. – 21 b.
5. Плунгян В.А.. Антирезультатив: до и после результата // Исследования по теории грамматики, вып. 1: Глагольные категории. М.: Русские словари, 2001. –С. 50–88.
6. Vendler Z. Verbs and Times // Philosophical Review 56, 1967.–P. 143 –160.
7. Verkuyl H. J. Formal Semantics Course. Lectures delivered in the St. Petersburg State University, 2002. –P. 71-109.
Published
2024-04-16
How to Cite
Manuchehr SALOXIDDINOV. (2024). GRAMMATICAL INDICATORS OF COMPLETION. News of the NUUz, 1(1.4), 348-351. https://doi.org/10.69617/uzmu.v1i1.4.2101