THE PROBLEM OF CONCEPTUAL METAPHOR AND LINGUISTIC EXPRESSIONS
Abstract
The article deals the metaphors are considered to be one such type of linguistic deviation that leads to foregrounding and defamiliarization. However, the assumption that these violations are deliberately used for the sake of drawing attention to their status as being violations becomes problematic when considered in light of the findings of Conceptual Metaphor Theory.
References
Cameron L. Identifying and describing metaphor in spoken discourse data. In: L. Cameron and G. Low (eds), Researching and applying metaphor, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2002. – P. 105-132.
Gibbs R. W. Introspection and cognitive linguistics: Should we trust our
own intuitions? Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 4, 2006. – P. 135-152.
Kövecses Z. Metaphors of anger, pride, and love: A lexical approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 2003. – 197 p.
Lakoff G. and Johnson M. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books. 1980. – 163 p.
Кубрякова Е. С. Об установках когнитивной науки и актуальных проблемах когнитивной лингвистики // Известия АН. Серия литературы и языка, том 63, № 3, 2004.
https://sites.google.com/site/derzispit/6-speak-on-the-stylistic-analysis-on-the-graphic-level 8. http://www.etymonline.com
Copyright (c) 2024 News of the NUUz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.jpg)
1.png)
This work is licensed under a 