ПРОБЛЕМЫ ПЕРЕВОДА АНГЛОЯЗЫЧНОГО ПРАВОВОГО ДИСКУРСА
Ключевые слова:
Юридические документы, английский юридический дискурс, особенности перевода, вопросы перевода и сравнительного переводческого анализа
Аннотация
При работе с юридическими текстами необходимо учитывать не только типичные основные черты узбекского и английского правового доказательства, но и различия правовых систем каждой страны. При переводе с одного языка на другой важно правильно передать содержание юридических документов. Авторы изучают синтаксический анализ, лексический анализ, сопоставительный перевод с целью выявить типичные основные черты английской юридической лексики и предложить методику решения проблем, возникающих при переводе юридических текстов. Примеры изучаемых материалов включают конкретные лексемы (употребительные слова, сленг, латинские слова, аббревиатуры), аутентичные британские и американские юридические источники, в том числе юридические документы.
Литература
1. Alwazna R.Y. Translation and Legal Terminology: Techniques for Coping with the Untranslatability of Legal Terms between Arabic and English. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Semiotique Juridique, 2018. p. 75–94.
2. Anesa P. Towards a Conceptualization of Legal English as a Lingua Franca? International Journal of English Linguistics. 2019. p. 14-21.
3. Burukina O. A. Translation of English legal documents. Moscow: Nauka. 2005
4. Chiknaverova K. G. Using semantization as a means of propedeutics of learners’ lexical errors in the course of teaching legal English at university. Yazyk i Kul’tura, 2009. p. 47, 277–300.
5. Harold D. Lasswell & Myers S. McDougal, Trends in Theories About Law: The Conception of Relevant Intellectual Tasks, in jurisprudence for a free society: studies in law, science and policy. New Haven Press 1992. p. 203, 212-17, 220-23, 231-35, 236-42.
6. Kredens K. J. & Drugan J. Translation in Superdiverse Legal Contexts. Blackledge (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Superdiversity. Routledge, 2018. p. 411-425.
7. Matulewska A. Legal and LSP Linguistics and Translation: Asian Languages’ Perspectives. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 2019. p.32
8. Monzo E. Translation and Culture in Legal Settings and Institutions. The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Culture. 2018. p. 463-482
9. Perez-Perdomo R. Lost in Translation? Latin American Lawyers-Students in American Law Schools: Transplants and Globalization. Onati Socio-Legal Series, 9(6), 2019. p. 1078–1096.
10. Sammut I. The translation of EU trademarks – a special type of
translation. International Journal of Legal Discourse, 3(1), 2018. p. 133–158.
11. Van Gerwen H. Studying the forms and functions of legal translations in history: the case of 19th - century Belgium. Translation and Interpreting : The International Journal of Translation and Interpreting Research, 11(2), 2018. p. 106–118.
12. William N., Phillip P. An Historical and Critical Introduction to The Legal Process, in the legal process: basic problems in the making and application of law li, (Hart et al ed., 1994)
13. Zgonnikova A. A. Clichéd phrases in business discourse. Professional communication: topical issues of linguistics and methodology, 2014. p. 7, 32-41.
2. Anesa P. Towards a Conceptualization of Legal English as a Lingua Franca? International Journal of English Linguistics. 2019. p. 14-21.
3. Burukina O. A. Translation of English legal documents. Moscow: Nauka. 2005
4. Chiknaverova K. G. Using semantization as a means of propedeutics of learners’ lexical errors in the course of teaching legal English at university. Yazyk i Kul’tura, 2009. p. 47, 277–300.
5. Harold D. Lasswell & Myers S. McDougal, Trends in Theories About Law: The Conception of Relevant Intellectual Tasks, in jurisprudence for a free society: studies in law, science and policy. New Haven Press 1992. p. 203, 212-17, 220-23, 231-35, 236-42.
6. Kredens K. J. & Drugan J. Translation in Superdiverse Legal Contexts. Blackledge (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Superdiversity. Routledge, 2018. p. 411-425.
7. Matulewska A. Legal and LSP Linguistics and Translation: Asian Languages’ Perspectives. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 2019. p.32
8. Monzo E. Translation and Culture in Legal Settings and Institutions. The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Culture. 2018. p. 463-482
9. Perez-Perdomo R. Lost in Translation? Latin American Lawyers-Students in American Law Schools: Transplants and Globalization. Onati Socio-Legal Series, 9(6), 2019. p. 1078–1096.
10. Sammut I. The translation of EU trademarks – a special type of
translation. International Journal of Legal Discourse, 3(1), 2018. p. 133–158.
11. Van Gerwen H. Studying the forms and functions of legal translations in history: the case of 19th - century Belgium. Translation and Interpreting : The International Journal of Translation and Interpreting Research, 11(2), 2018. p. 106–118.
12. William N., Phillip P. An Historical and Critical Introduction to The Legal Process, in the legal process: basic problems in the making and application of law li, (Hart et al ed., 1994)
13. Zgonnikova A. A. Clichéd phrases in business discourse. Professional communication: topical issues of linguistics and methodology, 2014. p. 7, 32-41.
Опубликован
2024-04-16
Как цитировать
Bahora RAXMATOVA,. (2024). ПРОБЛЕМЫ ПЕРЕВОДА АНГЛОЯЗЫЧНОГО ПРАВОВОГО ДИСКУРСА. Вестник УзМУ, 1(1.4), 345-348. https://doi.org/10.69617/uzmu.v1i1.4.2100
Раздел
Статьи
.jpg)
2.png)
Эта работа лицензирована под 