ПОЯВЛЕНИЕ И ЗНАЧЕНИЕ СУДЕБНОЙ ЛИНГВИСТИКИ
Аннотация
Связь между лингвистикой и другими областями настолько обширна, что каждая область имеет свои собственные правила с точки зрения лингвистики. Изучая историю каждой области, можно увидеть, что лингвистика и термины этой области формировались и изучались. С этой точки зрения можно понять, что судебная лингвистика формировалась вместе с историческим развитием суда
Литература
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).
Svartvik J. (1968). The Evans Statements: A Case for Forensic Linguistics. Goteborg: University of Goteborg. At p 332.
Johnston, T. S. (1966). The Judges' Rules and Police Interrogation in England Today. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology,
and Police Science, 85-92.
Olsson, J., & Luchjenbroers, J. (2013). Forensic linguistics. A&C Black.at p 337.
Blackwell, S. (2012). History of forensic linguistics. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics.at p 223.
Blackwell, S. (2012). History of forensic linguistics. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics.at p 228.
Olsson, J. (2014). What is Forensic Linguistics? the text. Co. UK/docs/what_is. Doc>. Acesso em, 25.
Schmalleger, F., Donaldson, S., Kashiwahara, K., Koppal, T., Chase, S., Brown, A., ... & Marash, D. (2014). Criminal justice today.
Prentice Hall. At p 125-128.
Olsson, J. (2014). What is Forensic Linguistics? the text. Co. UK/docs/what_is. Doc>. Acesso em, 25.
Levi, J. N. (1994). Language as evidence: the linguist as expert witness in North American courts. Forensic linguistics, 1(1): 1-26.
Rogers, R., Rogstad, J. E., Gillard, N. D., Drogin, E. Y., Blackwood, H. L., & Shuman, D. W. (2010). “Everyone knows their
Miranda rights”: Implicit assumptions and countervailing evidence. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(3), 300.
Rogers, R., Rogstad, J. E., Gillard, N. D., Drogin, E. Y., Blackwood, H. L., & Shuman, D. W. (2010). “Everyone knows their
Miranda rights”: Implicit assumptions and countervailing evidence. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(3), 300.
Rogers, R., Rogstad, J. E., Gillard, N. D., Drogin, E. Y., Blackwood, H. L., & Shuman, D. W. (2010). “Everyone knows their
Miranda rights”: Implicit assumptions and countervailing evidence. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(3), 300.
Rigney, A. (1999). Questioning in Interpreted Testimony. Forensic Linguistics, 6(1): 83– 108.
Krouglov, A. (1999). Police Interpreting: Politeness and Sociocultural Context. The Translator, 5(2): 285–302.
Olsson, J. (2014). What is Forensic Linguistics? the text. Co. UK/docs/what_is. Doc>. Acesso em, 25.
Shuy, R. W. (1997). The language of confession, interrogation, and deception (Vol. 2). Sage publications.
Olsson, J. (2014). What is Forensic Linguistics? the text. Co. UK/docs/what_is. Doc>. Acesso em, 25
Coulthard, M., Johnson, A., & Wright, D. (2016). An introduction to forensic linguistics: Language in evidence. Routledge. P 122-
Cole, R. W., & Maslow-Armand, L. (1997). Role of Counsel and the Courts in Addressing Foreign Language and Cultural Barriers
at Different Stages of a Criminal Proceeding, the. W. New Eng. L. Rev., 19, 193.
Pollard Jr, R. Q., & Berlinski, B. T. (2017). Forensic Evaluation of Deaf Individuals: Challenges and Strategies. Journal of social
work in disability & rehabilitation, 16(3-4), 261-275.
Saman, S. (2017). Potensi dan Tantangan Forensik Linguistik di Indonesia. ILSIA, 3.
Volck, B. (2018). Silent Communion: The Prophetic Witness of The Profoundly Disabled. Journal of Disability & Religion, 1-8.
Meyer, M. I., & Tredoux, C. G. (2016). Who do you believe? Effects of English, Cape Coloured and gay accents on perceived
witness credibility. Acta Criminologica: Southern African Journal of Criminology, 29(1), 18-32.
Menon, N. (2004). Recovering subversion: Feminist politics beyond the law. Ranikhet: Permanent Black. 115-126.
Meyer, M. I., & Tredoux, C. G. (2016). Who do you believe? Effects of English, Cape Coloured and gay accents on perceived
witness credibility. Acta Criminologica: Southern African Journal of Criminology, 29(1), 18-32.
Brubacher, S. P., Peterson, C., La Rooy, D., Dickinson, J. J., & Poole, D. A. (2019). How children talk about events: Implications
for eliciting and analyzing eyewitness reports. Developmental Review, 51, 70-89. Cambier-Langeveld, T. (2012). Clarification of
the issues in language analysis: a rejoinder to Fraser and Verrips. International Journal of Speech, Language & the Law, 19(2).
Hale, S. B. (2004). The discourse of court interpreting: Discourse practices of the law, the witness, and the interpreter, 52, John
Benjamins Publishing.
Hale, S. B. (2004). The discourse of court interpreting: Discourse practices of the law, the witness, and the interpreter, 52, John
Benjamins Publishing.
Benmaman, V. (1992). Legal Interpreting: An Emerging Profession. Modern Language Journal 76(4), Winter: 445–53.
Mandal, S. (2013). The burden of Intelligibility: Disabled women’s testimony in rape trials. Indian journal of gender studies, 20(1),
-29.
Miller, K. R., & Vernon, M. (2002). Assessing linguistic diversity in deaf criminal suspects. Sign Language Studies, 2(4), 380–390.
Patrick, P. L. (2019). Language Analysis for the Determination of Origin (LADO): An Introduction. In Language Analysis for the
Determination of Origin (pp. 1-17). Springer, Cham.
Finkelhor, D., Turner, H. A., Shattuck, A., & Hamby, S. L. (2015). Prevalence of childhood exposure to violence, crime, and abuse:
Results from the national survey of children’s exposure to violence. JAMA Pediatrics, 169(8), 746-754.
Copen, L. M. (2000). Preparing children for court: A practitioner's guide. Sage Publications.
Brubacher, S. P., Peterson, C., La Rooy, D., Dickinson, J. J., & Poole, D. A. (2019). How children talk about events: Implications
for eliciting and analyzing eyewitness reports. Developmental Review, 51, 70-89. Cambier-Langeveld, T.(2012). Clarification of the
issues in language analysis: a rejoinder to Fraser and Verrips. International Journal of Speech, Language & the Law, 19(2).
Edwards, J., Parson, J., & O‘Brien, W. (2016). Child play therapists’ understanding and application of the United Nations Convention
on the Rights of the Child: A narrative analysis. International Journal of Play Therapy, 25(3), 133.
Svartvik J. (1968). The Evans Statements: A Case for Forensic Linguistics. Goteborg: University of Goteborg
ANVAROVA, L. (2024). MEHNAT SAMARADORLIGI: IQTISODIY TARAQQIYOT VA UNI OPTIMALLASHTIRISH. News of the NUUz, 1(1.7. 1), 54-56.
ATANAZAROV, A. (2024). TALABA DZYUDOCHILARNI OG’IR ATLETIKA MASHQLARI YORDAMIDA PORTLOVCHI SIFATLARINI TAKOMILASHTIRISH. News of the NUUz, 1(1.7. 1), 57-59.
AXMEDOV, R. (2024). ABU BAKR MUHAMMAD ZAKARIYO ROZIY TA’LIMOTIDA AQL. News of the NUUz, 1(1.7. 1), 60-62.
Copyright (c) 2024 Вестник УзМУ
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование — На тех же условиях») 4.0 Всемирная.
.jpg)
2.png)
Эта работа лицензирована под 