THEORETICAL ASPECTS OF THE ORGANIZATION OF THE TRAINING SYSTEM BASED ON MOBILE EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES
Keywords:
Training system, Mobile educational technologies, Theoretical aspects, Constructivist learning theories, SAMR framework, Personalized learning, Collaborative activities, Gamification, Accessibility, Digital literacy, Data privacy, Mobile learning programs, Education technology, Learning outcomes, Engagement, Interactive learning environments
Abstract
This article explores the theoretical foundations underlying the organization of training systems utilizing mobile educational technologies. The author delves into key theoretical frameworks such as constructivist learning theories and the SAMR framework to guide the design, implementation, and evaluation of mobile learning programs. The discussion highlights the importance of personalized learning, collaborative activities, and gamification in creating engaging and interactive learning environments. Considerations such as accessibility, digital literacy, and data privacy are also addressed to ensure the success of mobile learning initiatives. Overall, the article emphasizes the significance of incorporating theoretical aspects into the organization of training systems to enhance learning outcomes and engagement in the digital age.
References
1. Alzahrani, A., & Benmoussa, A. (2020). Theoretical perspectives of mobile learning in higher education: A systematic review. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(1), 55-69.
2. Koole, M. L. (2009). A model for framing mobile learning. In M. Ally (Ed.), Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training (pp. 25-47). Athabasca University Press.
3. Puentedura, R. (2014). SAMR: A model for technology integration. Retrieved from http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2014/06/29/SAMR_AModelForTechnologyIntegration.pdf
4. Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2007). A theory of learning for the mobile age. In R. Andrews & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Sage handbook of elearning research (pp. 221-247). Sage Publications.
5. Traxler, J. (2007). Defining, discussing and evaluating mobile learning: The moving finger writes and having writ…. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2), 1-12.
6. Attewell, J., & Savill-Smith, C. (2009). Mobile learning and social inclusion: focusing on learners and learning. Learning and Skills Network.
7. Kearney, M., & Schuck, S. (2008). Exploring pedagogy with mobile technologies: Issues for research and practice. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17(3), 323-332.
8. Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Traxler, J. (2007). Design principles for mobile learning. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing for 21st century learning (pp. 247-259). Routledge.
9. Looi, C. K., Seow, P., Zhang, B. H., So, H. J., Chen, W., & Wong, L. H. (2010). Leveraging mobile technology for sustainable seamless learning: A research agenda. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 154-169.
10. Sharples, M., Adams, A., Ferguson, R., Gaved, M., McAndrew, P., Rienties, B., ... & Whitelock, D. (2014). Innovating Pedagogy 2014: Open University Innovation Report 3. The Open University.
11. Traxler, J. (2009). Learning in a mobile age. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 1(1), 1-12.
12. Vavoula, G., & Sharples, M. (2009). Meeting the challenges in evaluating mobile learning: A 3-level evaluation framework. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 1(2), 54-75.
13. Ally, M. (2009). Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training. Athabasca University Press.
14. Churchill, D. (2011). Towards a useful classification of learning applications on mobile devices. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 17(5), 674-696.
15. Hwang, G. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning: A review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), E65-E70.
2. Koole, M. L. (2009). A model for framing mobile learning. In M. Ally (Ed.), Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training (pp. 25-47). Athabasca University Press.
3. Puentedura, R. (2014). SAMR: A model for technology integration. Retrieved from http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2014/06/29/SAMR_AModelForTechnologyIntegration.pdf
4. Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2007). A theory of learning for the mobile age. In R. Andrews & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Sage handbook of elearning research (pp. 221-247). Sage Publications.
5. Traxler, J. (2007). Defining, discussing and evaluating mobile learning: The moving finger writes and having writ…. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2), 1-12.
6. Attewell, J., & Savill-Smith, C. (2009). Mobile learning and social inclusion: focusing on learners and learning. Learning and Skills Network.
7. Kearney, M., & Schuck, S. (2008). Exploring pedagogy with mobile technologies: Issues for research and practice. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17(3), 323-332.
8. Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Traxler, J. (2007). Design principles for mobile learning. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing for 21st century learning (pp. 247-259). Routledge.
9. Looi, C. K., Seow, P., Zhang, B. H., So, H. J., Chen, W., & Wong, L. H. (2010). Leveraging mobile technology for sustainable seamless learning: A research agenda. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 154-169.
10. Sharples, M., Adams, A., Ferguson, R., Gaved, M., McAndrew, P., Rienties, B., ... & Whitelock, D. (2014). Innovating Pedagogy 2014: Open University Innovation Report 3. The Open University.
11. Traxler, J. (2009). Learning in a mobile age. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 1(1), 1-12.
12. Vavoula, G., & Sharples, M. (2009). Meeting the challenges in evaluating mobile learning: A 3-level evaluation framework. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 1(2), 54-75.
13. Ally, M. (2009). Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training. Athabasca University Press.
14. Churchill, D. (2011). Towards a useful classification of learning applications on mobile devices. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 17(5), 674-696.
15. Hwang, G. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning: A review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), E65-E70.
Published
2024-04-09
How to Cite
Hamdam NOMOZOV. (2024). THEORETICAL ASPECTS OF THE ORGANIZATION OF THE TRAINING SYSTEM BASED ON MOBILE EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES. News of the NUUz, 1(1.4), 159-162. https://doi.org/10.69617/uzmu.v1i1.4.2030
Section
Articles
.jpg)
1.png)
This work is licensed under a 