THE IMPORTANCE OF CONTEXT PERCEPTION OF GENDER DISCOURSE

  • Zarnigor NARBUTAYEVA Guliston davlat universiteti stajyor -o’qituvchisi
Keywords: language, gender, sociolinguistics, culture, gender discourse, masculine, feminine, sexism.

Abstract

In this article, it is revealed that to what extent is some languages are sexist, beginning with the reality that the women is also put under pressure through languages and, as it is in almost every social area, there is sexism against women in languages. The conceptual expressions (such as gender, sexist language, language and ideology) are brought out that the dimension and the quality of the world's languages and which perspectives the sexist language is usually seen. Gender discourse representing the opposite views has a side if political views have an effect on preferring sexist expressions. What is come into the view is that
there is another cognition beyond social views in using sexist language. While there is no important difference in using sexist expressions according to the political views in some languages, they make a big contribution to the being the "secondary" and "other" of women.

References

Adams, R., and Savran, D. The Reader of Masculinity Studies-Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2002, p. 355-374.

Ann Oakley. The Sociology of Housework. Edition, reprint; Publisher, Robertson, 1974; ISBN, 0855200731,

Aristarkhova I.L. «Ethics of sex differences» in the concept of Lucy Irigari // Sociological journal. 1998. No. 3-4. P. 191-

Aydar, H. ve Ulutaş, İ.(2010). Dilin kökeni: Kuran’ı Kerim ve diğer kutsal kitaplara göre dil olgusu. Turkish Studies

International Periodical For the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic. 5(4).

Aydın, M. (2007). Dil bilim el kitabı, temel kavramlar ve konular. İstanbul: 3 F Yayınevi. S13.

Berktay, Fatmagül. 1994. Kadın Olmak, Yasamak, Yazmak, Pencere, Istanbul. p.12

Marshall, Gordon, (1999), Sosyoloji Sözlüğü, İstanbul: Bilim ve Sanat Mitchell, J. - A. Oakley, (1992), Kadın ve Eşitlik,

İstanbul: Pencere.

Bott, E. (1955). Urban families. Conjugal roles and social networks. Human Relations 8, S. 345 – 383. CrossRef Google

Scholar.

Butler, J., The Gender problem: Feminism and the Destruction of Identity. Routledge, 1990, p. 143-152.

Çelebi, Nilgün, (İ990), Kadınlarımızın Cinsiyet Rolü Tutumları, Konya: Sebat Ofset.

ABDULLAYEVA, R. (2024). HAYOT SIFATINI IFODALOVCHI KO ‘RSATKICHLAR VA ULARNING IJTIMOIY-PSIXOLOGIK XUSUSIYATLARI. News of the NUUz, 1(1.8. 1), 44-46.

ABDUMALIKOV, A. (2024). JAMIYATDA UZLIKSIZ TAʼLIM TIZIMINING SHAXS EKOLOGIK MADANIYATI YUKSALISHIDAGI ROLI. News of the NUUz, 1(1.8. 1), 47-49.

ABDURAZAKOVA, S. (2024). NEW COMMUNICATIVE METHODS IN MILITARY ENGLISH TEACHING. News of the NUUz, 1(1.8. 1), 50-52.

Published
2024-10-15
How to Cite
NARBUTAYEVA, Z. (2024). THE IMPORTANCE OF CONTEXT PERCEPTION OF GENDER DISCOURSE. News of the NUUz, 1(1.5.2), 139-140. https://doi.org/10.69617/nuuz.v1i1.5.2.4164