PRINCIPLES OF IMPROVING STUDENTS’ LANGUAGE COMPETENCES OF NON-PHILOLOGICAL EDUCATION

  • Maftuna OMONOVA Teacher of Primary Faculty Department, Chirchik State Pedagogical University
Keywords: Language competences, non-philological, education, students, language proficiency, academic, professional context.

Abstract

This article deals with the foundational principles guiding the enhancement of language competences among students pursuing nonphilological education. The study recognizes the growing importance of language proficiency in various academic and professional contexts and seeks to provide a comprehensive framework for educators and institutions to improve students' language skills. By synthesizing current pedagogical theories, empirical studies, and practical applications, the research aims to identify key principles that can effectively elevate the language competences of non-philological education students.

References

Cummins, J. (2000). Language, Power and Pedagogy: Bilingual Children in the Crossfire. Multilingual Matters.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). Spoken and Written Language. Deakin University Press.

Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press.

Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms. John Benjamins

Publishing.

Stoller, F. L. (2002). Content-Based Instruction: A Shell for Language Teaching or a Framework for Strategic Language and

Content Learning? In J. Cenoz & F. Genesee (Eds.), Beyond Bilingualism: Multilingualism and Multilingual Education (pp. 67–

. Multilingual Matters.

Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (1997). Content-Based Instruction: Research Foundations. In M. A. Snow & D. M. Brinton (Eds.), The

Content-Based Classroom: Perspectives on Integrating Language and Content (pp. 5–21). Addison Wesley Longman.

Godwin-Jones, R. (2011). Emerging Technologies: Mobile Apps for Language Learning. Language Learning & Technology,

(2), 2–11.

Coyle, D. (2005). Developing CLIL: Towards a Theory of Practice. AILA Review, 18(1), 3–31.

Wolff, D. (2009). CLIL: A Lesson in the Making. Folio: Journal of the Association for European Language Testers, 13(2), 15–25.

Johnson, M., & Jackson, A. (2015). Language Skills and Workplace Success: The Relationship between Proficiency in English

and Occupational Status in the United States. TESOL Quarterly, 49(3), 546–567.

Wong, C., & Jones, P. (2012). Language Proficiency and Cognitive Development: A Longitudinal Study of Non-Philological

University Students. Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 282–304.

Byram, M., & Feng, A. (2006). Living and Studying Abroad: Research and Practice. Multilingual Matters.

Norton, B., & Schmidt, R. (2011). Social Identity and Language Learning in Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education,

(6), 709–722.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1),

-74.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.

Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language. Heinle & Heinle.

Published
2024-09-18
How to Cite
OMONOVA, M. (2024). PRINCIPLES OF IMPROVING STUDENTS’ LANGUAGE COMPETENCES OF NON-PHILOLOGICAL EDUCATION. News of the NUUz, 1(1.7.1), 149-151. https://doi.org/10.69617/nuuz.v1i1.7.1.3356