NОFILOLOGIK TA’LIM TALABALARINING TIL KOMPETENTSIYALARINI TAKOMILLASHTIRISH TAMOYILLARI

  • Maftuna OMONOVA Teacher of Primary Faculty Department, Chirchik State Pedagogical University
##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##: https://doi.org/10.69617/nuuz.v1i1.7.1.3356
"Kalit so‘zlar" : Til kompetentsiyalari, filologik bo'lmagan ta'lim, talabalar, tilni bilish, akademik, professional kontekst.

"Maqola"

Ushbu maqolada nofilologik talabalarda til kompetentsiyasini oshirishni belgilaydigan asosiy tamoyillar ko'rib chiqiladi. Tadqiqot turli akademik va kasbiy kontekstlarda tilni bilishning ortib borayotgan ahamiyatini tan oladi va o'qituvchilar va muassasalarga o'quvchilarning til ko'nikmalarini yaxshilash uchun keng qamrovli asos yaratishni maqsad qilgan. Zamonaviy pedagogik nazariyalar, empirik tadqiqotlar va amaliy qo'llanmalarni sintez qilish orqali tadqiqot filologik bo'lmagan ta'lim talabalarining til qobiliyatini samarali oshirishi mumkin bo'lgan asosiy tamoyillarni aniqlashga qaratilgan.

References

Cummins, J. (2000). Language, Power and Pedagogy: Bilingual Children in the Crossfire. Multilingual Matters.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). Spoken and Written Language. Deakin University Press.

Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press.

Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms. John Benjamins

Publishing.

Stoller, F. L. (2002). Content-Based Instruction: A Shell for Language Teaching or a Framework for Strategic Language and

Content Learning? In J. Cenoz & F. Genesee (Eds.), Beyond Bilingualism: Multilingualism and Multilingual Education (pp. 67–

. Multilingual Matters.

Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (1997). Content-Based Instruction: Research Foundations. In M. A. Snow & D. M. Brinton (Eds.), The

Content-Based Classroom: Perspectives on Integrating Language and Content (pp. 5–21). Addison Wesley Longman.

Godwin-Jones, R. (2011). Emerging Technologies: Mobile Apps for Language Learning. Language Learning & Technology,

(2), 2–11.

Coyle, D. (2005). Developing CLIL: Towards a Theory of Practice. AILA Review, 18(1), 3–31.

Wolff, D. (2009). CLIL: A Lesson in the Making. Folio: Journal of the Association for European Language Testers, 13(2), 15–25.

Johnson, M., & Jackson, A. (2015). Language Skills and Workplace Success: The Relationship between Proficiency in English

and Occupational Status in the United States. TESOL Quarterly, 49(3), 546–567.

Wong, C., & Jones, P. (2012). Language Proficiency and Cognitive Development: A Longitudinal Study of Non-Philological

University Students. Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 282–304.

Byram, M., & Feng, A. (2006). Living and Studying Abroad: Research and Practice. Multilingual Matters.

Norton, B., & Schmidt, R. (2011). Social Identity and Language Learning in Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education,

(6), 709–722.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1),

-74.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.

Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language. Heinle & Heinle.

Nashr qilingan
2024-09-18